<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MLB Draft Review: 2001 Part One</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rotorob.com/2007/01/29/mlb-draft-review-2001-part-one/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rotorob.com/2007/01/29/mlb-draft-review-2001-part-one/</link>
	<description>Fantasy Sports Analysis With an Edge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 15:33:51 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Major League Baseball Draft &#124; RotoRob</title>
		<link>http://www.rotorob.com/2007/01/29/mlb-draft-review-2001-part-one/comment-page-1/#comment-35028</link>
		<dc:creator>Major League Baseball Draft &#124; RotoRob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rotorob.com/baseball/mlb-draft-review-2001-part-one/#comment-35028</guid>
		<description>[...] part of our review of the first round of the 2001 MLB Draft. You can find previous parts here: One, Two, Three , Four and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] part of our review of the first round of the 2001 MLB Draft. You can find previous parts here: One, Two, Three , Four and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Major League Baseball Draft &#124; RotoRob</title>
		<link>http://www.rotorob.com/2007/01/29/mlb-draft-review-2001-part-one/comment-page-1/#comment-34694</link>
		<dc:creator>Major League Baseball Draft &#124; RotoRob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 21:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rotorob.com/baseball/mlb-draft-review-2001-part-one/#comment-34694</guid>
		<description>[...] today, with a look at picks 16 through 20 of the first round. You can find previous parts here: Part I, II and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] today, with a look at picks 16 through 20 of the first round. You can find previous parts here: Part I, II and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Major League Baseball Draft &#124; RotoRob</title>
		<link>http://www.rotorob.com/2007/01/29/mlb-draft-review-2001-part-one/comment-page-1/#comment-34511</link>
		<dc:creator>Major League Baseball Draft &#124; RotoRob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 14:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rotorob.com/baseball/mlb-draft-review-2001-part-one/#comment-34511</guid>
		<description>[...] today, with a look at picks 11 through 15 of the first round. You can find previous parts here: Part I and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] today, with a look at picks 11 through 15 of the first round. You can find previous parts here: Part I and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Major League Baseball Draft &#124; RotoRob</title>
		<link>http://www.rotorob.com/2007/01/29/mlb-draft-review-2001-part-one/comment-page-1/#comment-34483</link>
		<dc:creator>Major League Baseball Draft &#124; RotoRob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 00:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rotorob.com/baseball/mlb-draft-review-2001-part-one/#comment-34483</guid>
		<description>[...] last left off, RotoRob had started previewing the 2001 draft, the first part of which you can find here. Over the next few parts of this series, I&#8217;ll be previewing the rest of this draft through [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] last left off, RotoRob had started previewing the 2001 draft, the first part of which you can find here. Over the next few parts of this series, I&#8217;ll be previewing the rest of this draft through [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RotoRob</title>
		<link>http://www.rotorob.com/2007/01/29/mlb-draft-review-2001-part-one/comment-page-1/#comment-338</link>
		<dc:creator>RotoRob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 18:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rotorob.com/baseball/mlb-draft-review-2001-part-one/#comment-338</guid>
		<description>Sure, it&#039;s easy to speculate on how good the Twins&#039; pitching would have been with Santana and Prior heading the way, but shouldn&#039;t we also consider how big a role Mauer has had on helping the Twins develop a fantastic pitching staff? Of course this is a tough question, but looking at things from a fantasy perspective, finding a catcher who can hit like Mauer is next to impossible. Will Prior fly past Mauer in value in years to come? It&#039;s possible, but judging the selection five years out and you&#039;ve got to give the edge to Minny here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, it&#8217;s easy to speculate on how good the Twins&#8217; pitching would have been with Santana and Prior heading the way, but shouldn&#8217;t we also consider how big a role Mauer has had on helping the Twins develop a fantastic pitching staff? Of course this is a tough question, but looking at things from a fantasy perspective, finding a catcher who can hit like Mauer is next to impossible. Will Prior fly past Mauer in value in years to come? It&#8217;s possible, but judging the selection five years out and you&#8217;ve got to give the edge to Minny here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://www.rotorob.com/2007/01/29/mlb-draft-review-2001-part-one/comment-page-1/#comment-334</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 07:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rotorob.com/baseball/mlb-draft-review-2001-part-one/#comment-334</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a Twins fan and have often thought about the Mauer-Prior question. Lots of Twins fans are quick to point out in retrospect that the Twins, despite early criticism, made the right choice. I&#039;m not as convinced.

Flags fly forever. What if the Twins had both Mark Prior and Johan Santana in their rotation back in 2003? That 1-2 punch would have made beating the Twins in the postseason a formidable task.

Maybe, if the Twins would have drafted Prior, they&#039;d have a third World Championship pennant hanging in the rafters of the Metrodome right now.

As with all things, the Mauer-Prior question isn&#039;t as simple as it appears, even now.

The Twins are also a lot more cautious with their young pitching. Entirely speculative, but perhaps Prior doesn&#039;t suffer the same injury woes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a Twins fan and have often thought about the Mauer-Prior question. Lots of Twins fans are quick to point out in retrospect that the Twins, despite early criticism, made the right choice. I&#8217;m not as convinced.</p>
<p>Flags fly forever. What if the Twins had both Mark Prior and Johan Santana in their rotation back in 2003? That 1-2 punch would have made beating the Twins in the postseason a formidable task.</p>
<p>Maybe, if the Twins would have drafted Prior, they&#8217;d have a third World Championship pennant hanging in the rafters of the Metrodome right now.</p>
<p>As with all things, the Mauer-Prior question isn&#8217;t as simple as it appears, even now.</p>
<p>The Twins are also a lot more cautious with their young pitching. Entirely speculative, but perhaps Prior doesn&#8217;t suffer the same injury woes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
