<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2009 RotoRob NFL Draft Kit: Oakland Raiders Team Preview</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rotorob.com/2009/06/20/2009-rotorob-nfl-draft-kit-oakland-raiders-team-preview/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rotorob.com/2009/06/20/2009-rotorob-nfl-draft-kit-oakland-raiders-team-preview/</link>
	<description>Fantasy Sports Analysis With an Edge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:06:56 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Herija</title>
		<link>http://www.rotorob.com/2009/06/20/2009-rotorob-nfl-draft-kit-oakland-raiders-team-preview/comment-page-1/#comment-32124</link>
		<dc:creator>Herija</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 18:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rotorob.com/?p=5131#comment-32124</guid>
		<description>First off, Joe Smith... here is the link to John Clayton&#039;s article dated June 2, 2009: http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/columns/story?columnist=clayton_john&amp;id=4230333

Scroll down and you&#039;ll find the item about Bush. I didn&#039;t make it up or use a 2008 article. That&#039;s the word that&#039;s out there - clearly he&#039;s not the bruising blocker that Neal (or even O&#039;Neal) is but maybe they just want to get him on the field more often w/o taking away touches from McFadden and feel this is a way to do it.

Also, at no point have I said Bush isn&#039;t a capable receiver. I saw him play against SD in Wk 4 when he caught seven passes for 80 yards, but guess what? Kiffin was fired after that game, and Bush only had 11 grabs the rest of the season. McFadden, despite missing three games after that point, had 22. That underscores my point, McFadden is their best receiver out of the backfield from a fantasy perspective.

Bottom line, I think Bush has enough statistical upside to be drafted in a standard league, which is pretty high praise for a guy listed third on the depth chart and getting fullback ink. Anyone reading this that believes I don&#039;t think Bush is a talent is dead wrong. It just boils down to how many touches the Raiders will give him at the expense of McFadden and Fargas.

As for the AFC West as a whole, you&#039;re absolutely right, it&#039;s probably the worst division in football (NFC West is right there as well). But, the Chargers are still the class of that division and picking Oakland to finish higher than second is being optimistic. Is it possible? Of course. Is it likely? No.

Finally, as far as a comparison to Miami, keep in mind the Dolphins brought in an entirely new front office (led by Parcells, who has a history of turning franchises around) and a veteran quarterback that played at a Pro Bowl level. Plus, they drew the NFC and AFC West -- see the above paragraph for my thoughts on those divisions -- which helped immensely. This year, OAK plays NYG, PHI, DAL, WAS, PIT and BAL in addition to two against SD, who I don&#039;t think they&#039;ve beaten since the Reagan administration. I just don&#039;t see it. I will say this, though, it wouldn&#039;t surprise me if Oakland wins 7-8 games and breaks their run of 10-plus-loss seasons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First off, Joe Smith&#8230; here is the link to John Clayton&#8217;s article dated June 2, 2009: <a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/columns/story?columnist=clayton_john&amp;id=4230333" rel="nofollow">http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/columns/story?columnist=clayton_john&amp;id=4230333</a></p>
<p>Scroll down and you&#8217;ll find the item about Bush. I didn&#8217;t make it up or use a 2008 article. That&#8217;s the word that&#8217;s out there &#8211; clearly he&#8217;s not the bruising blocker that Neal (or even O&#8217;Neal) is but maybe they just want to get him on the field more often w/o taking away touches from McFadden and feel this is a way to do it.</p>
<p>Also, at no point have I said Bush isn&#8217;t a capable receiver. I saw him play against SD in Wk 4 when he caught seven passes for 80 yards, but guess what? Kiffin was fired after that game, and Bush only had 11 grabs the rest of the season. McFadden, despite missing three games after that point, had 22. That underscores my point, McFadden is their best receiver out of the backfield from a fantasy perspective.</p>
<p>Bottom line, I think Bush has enough statistical upside to be drafted in a standard league, which is pretty high praise for a guy listed third on the depth chart and getting fullback ink. Anyone reading this that believes I don&#8217;t think Bush is a talent is dead wrong. It just boils down to how many touches the Raiders will give him at the expense of McFadden and Fargas.</p>
<p>As for the AFC West as a whole, you&#8217;re absolutely right, it&#8217;s probably the worst division in football (NFC West is right there as well). But, the Chargers are still the class of that division and picking Oakland to finish higher than second is being optimistic. Is it possible? Of course. Is it likely? No.</p>
<p>Finally, as far as a comparison to Miami, keep in mind the Dolphins brought in an entirely new front office (led by Parcells, who has a history of turning franchises around) and a veteran quarterback that played at a Pro Bowl level. Plus, they drew the NFC and AFC West &#8212; see the above paragraph for my thoughts on those divisions &#8212; which helped immensely. This year, OAK plays NYG, PHI, DAL, WAS, PIT and BAL in addition to two against SD, who I don&#8217;t think they&#8217;ve beaten since the Reagan administration. I just don&#8217;t see it. I will say this, though, it wouldn&#8217;t surprise me if Oakland wins 7-8 games and breaks their run of 10-plus-loss seasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raider Nation</title>
		<link>http://www.rotorob.com/2009/06/20/2009-rotorob-nfl-draft-kit-oakland-raiders-team-preview/comment-page-1/#comment-32121</link>
		<dc:creator>Raider Nation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 13:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rotorob.com/?p=5131#comment-32121</guid>
		<description>Miami almost set the nfl record for not winning a game. The following year they turned around and surprised everybody. New England went undefeated in the regular season, and lost in the Superbowl. The cowboys were guaranteed a promising year, because of TO. In this game so exciting and full of upsets, you can very well be looking at the next superbowl champs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Miami almost set the nfl record for not winning a game. The following year they turned around and surprised everybody. New England went undefeated in the regular season, and lost in the Superbowl. The cowboys were guaranteed a promising year, because of TO. In this game so exciting and full of upsets, you can very well be looking at the next superbowl champs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.rotorob.com/2009/06/20/2009-rotorob-nfl-draft-kit-oakland-raiders-team-preview/comment-page-1/#comment-32117</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 21:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rotorob.com/?p=5131#comment-32117</guid>
		<description>That Clayton Article about full back is OLD AZZ news as well.  That was last year and only came about because of injury.  It&#039;s not a very good source for a current snapshot of the team or our running back situation.

With Oren O&#039;Neal healthy and Lorenzo Neal now in the fold I don&#039;t think anybody&#039;s really planning on lining Bush up at FB unless absolutely necessary.

Get Current Please.

I also agree that Bush as a receiver is just as capable as McFadden in terms of catching the ball.  He doesn&#039;t have the kind of speed McFadden has after the catch, which obviously inflates yardage and fantasy numbers, but he&#039;s a VERY capable receiver.

The other thing you failed to mention is the opportunities that will arise from our division being so weak this year.  Even though the Raiders (unfortunately) have to square off with the NFC East, we have a pretty favorable schedule.

Otherwise....the piece is solid.  Better than some of the fanboy crap I&#039;m forced to read from other Raider fans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That Clayton Article about full back is OLD AZZ news as well.  That was last year and only came about because of injury.  It&#8217;s not a very good source for a current snapshot of the team or our running back situation.</p>
<p>With Oren O&#8217;Neal healthy and Lorenzo Neal now in the fold I don&#8217;t think anybody&#8217;s really planning on lining Bush up at FB unless absolutely necessary.</p>
<p>Get Current Please.</p>
<p>I also agree that Bush as a receiver is just as capable as McFadden in terms of catching the ball.  He doesn&#8217;t have the kind of speed McFadden has after the catch, which obviously inflates yardage and fantasy numbers, but he&#8217;s a VERY capable receiver.</p>
<p>The other thing you failed to mention is the opportunities that will arise from our division being so weak this year.  Even though the Raiders (unfortunately) have to square off with the NFC East, we have a pretty favorable schedule.</p>
<p>Otherwise&#8230;.the piece is solid.  Better than some of the fanboy crap I&#8217;m forced to read from other Raider fans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Herija</title>
		<link>http://www.rotorob.com/2009/06/20/2009-rotorob-nfl-draft-kit-oakland-raiders-team-preview/comment-page-1/#comment-32108</link>
		<dc:creator>Herija</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rotorob.com/?p=5131#comment-32108</guid>
		<description>Wow - gotta love the passion of Raiders fans. First off, the comment on here about Bush&#039;s injury is correct, that should&#039;ve read &quot;catastrophic leg injury&quot; and I put knee. That&#039;s something I should&#039;ve caught on the read through and did not, which is on me.

Beyond that, most of the comments on here scream defensive Raider fan. To pretend Russell&#039;s accuracy issues - he&#039;s a career 53.9% passer - are imagined (or that they&#039;re the fault of an admittedly poor receiving corps) is laughable. Yes, he&#039;s drawn some favorable reviews this offseason, and the presence of Garcia should push him to raise his game, but he&#039;s still being characterized as &quot;hit or miss&quot; with his accuracy from one day to the next... and those are reports from THIS offseason. Do I think he&#039;s a lost cause? HELL no. He was the No. 1 pick because he has immense talent and tremendous physical gifts, and the Raiders have not put him in a position to succeed. That being said, from a fantasy perspective I stand by what I wrote - a standard league consists of 10 teams/15 rounds (150 picks), and I was recently in a 14-team expert draft (w/ dudes like Karabell, Engel &amp; Pianowski) where Russell went with the 223rd pick (a full 73 selections outside that range). He&#039;s not draftable in standard leagues. Period.

Michael Bush is a better passer than Darren McFadden? How is that relevant to anything? For better or worse McFadden is Davis&#039; guy, so much so that John Clayton recently had an article where he mentioned how Bush is unhappy in Oakland because they might put him at FB, comparing it to Le&#039;Ron McClain&#039;s situation in Baltimore. Also, Bush is a capable receiver, but come on now, he&#039;s not McFadden. The Raiders have been lining up McFadden in the slot AS A RECEIVER during the offseason. There&#039;s no way, barring injury, Bush has more receptions than McFadden.

And lastly, we&#039;re talking about Chaz Schilens and Louis Murphy? Schilens played here at SDSU, I like him, he&#039;s got upside, but he&#039;s not getting drafted in a fantasy league. Murphy, aka James Jett 2009, is a deep guy and not much else at this point, which isn&#039;t a recipe for immediate success in the league. Maybe a flier in a DEEP keeper league, but he&#039;s gonna be what? the 5th receiver? Come on now, you know better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow &#8211; gotta love the passion of Raiders fans. First off, the comment on here about Bush&#8217;s injury is correct, that should&#8217;ve read &#8220;catastrophic leg injury&#8221; and I put knee. That&#8217;s something I should&#8217;ve caught on the read through and did not, which is on me.</p>
<p>Beyond that, most of the comments on here scream defensive Raider fan. To pretend Russell&#8217;s accuracy issues &#8211; he&#8217;s a career 53.9% passer &#8211; are imagined (or that they&#8217;re the fault of an admittedly poor receiving corps) is laughable. Yes, he&#8217;s drawn some favorable reviews this offseason, and the presence of Garcia should push him to raise his game, but he&#8217;s still being characterized as &#8220;hit or miss&#8221; with his accuracy from one day to the next&#8230; and those are reports from THIS offseason. Do I think he&#8217;s a lost cause? HELL no. He was the No. 1 pick because he has immense talent and tremendous physical gifts, and the Raiders have not put him in a position to succeed. That being said, from a fantasy perspective I stand by what I wrote &#8211; a standard league consists of 10 teams/15 rounds (150 picks), and I was recently in a 14-team expert draft (w/ dudes like Karabell, Engel &amp; Pianowski) where Russell went with the 223rd pick (a full 73 selections outside that range). He&#8217;s not draftable in standard leagues. Period.</p>
<p>Michael Bush is a better passer than Darren McFadden? How is that relevant to anything? For better or worse McFadden is Davis&#8217; guy, so much so that John Clayton recently had an article where he mentioned how Bush is unhappy in Oakland because they might put him at FB, comparing it to Le&#8217;Ron McClain&#8217;s situation in Baltimore. Also, Bush is a capable receiver, but come on now, he&#8217;s not McFadden. The Raiders have been lining up McFadden in the slot AS A RECEIVER during the offseason. There&#8217;s no way, barring injury, Bush has more receptions than McFadden.</p>
<p>And lastly, we&#8217;re talking about Chaz Schilens and Louis Murphy? Schilens played here at SDSU, I like him, he&#8217;s got upside, but he&#8217;s not getting drafted in a fantasy league. Murphy, aka James Jett 2009, is a deep guy and not much else at this point, which isn&#8217;t a recipe for immediate success in the league. Maybe a flier in a DEEP keeper league, but he&#8217;s gonna be what? the 5th receiver? Come on now, you know better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.rotorob.com/2009/06/20/2009-rotorob-nfl-draft-kit-oakland-raiders-team-preview/comment-page-1/#comment-32096</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 02:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rotorob.com/?p=5131#comment-32096</guid>
		<description>I had to check the date of this article.The information is old and inaccurate.Which tells me writer does not follow this team,but only repeats other articles.No mention of Chaz or Murphy? Those two will be the real producers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had to check the date of this article.The information is old and inaccurate.Which tells me writer does not follow this team,but only repeats other articles.No mention of Chaz or Murphy? Those two will be the real producers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BoKnows</title>
		<link>http://www.rotorob.com/2009/06/20/2009-rotorob-nfl-draft-kit-oakland-raiders-team-preview/comment-page-1/#comment-32095</link>
		<dc:creator>BoKnows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 01:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rotorob.com/?p=5131#comment-32095</guid>
		<description>Think. Jamacus hit Miller accurately whenever he was open. Why? Because Miller was where he should have been.
From his first pass, a sideline screamer/rope, JRuss has proven he&#039;ll hit theopen guy if he&#039;s where he&#039;s supposed to be.
It&#039;s not on JRuss, it&#039;s on the receivers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Think. Jamacus hit Miller accurately whenever he was open. Why? Because Miller was where he should have been.<br />
From his first pass, a sideline screamer/rope, JRuss has proven he&#8217;ll hit theopen guy if he&#8217;s where he&#8217;s supposed to be.<br />
It&#8217;s not on JRuss, it&#8217;s on the receivers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.rotorob.com/2009/06/20/2009-rotorob-nfl-draft-kit-oakland-raiders-team-preview/comment-page-1/#comment-32094</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 22:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rotorob.com/?p=5131#comment-32094</guid>
		<description>You shouldn&#039;t write articals about teams you know nothing about. 

I stopped reading when you described Bush&#039;s college injure as a knee injury. 

HE BROKE HIS LEG AND HAD A ROD INSERTED!!!!!!

Do your homework.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You shouldn&#8217;t write articals about teams you know nothing about. </p>
<p>I stopped reading when you described Bush&#8217;s college injure as a knee injury. </p>
<p>HE BROKE HIS LEG AND HAD A ROD INSERTED!!!!!!</p>
<p>Do your homework.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Raid</title>
		<link>http://www.rotorob.com/2009/06/20/2009-rotorob-nfl-draft-kit-oakland-raiders-team-preview/comment-page-1/#comment-32093</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Raid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 18:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rotorob.com/?p=5131#comment-32093</guid>
		<description>You neglected to mention how much sharper Russell looked in his final OTA. You also failed to mention that Russell accuracy issues could be linked to the Raider&#039;s defense applying intense pressure on Russell right out the box. This was Cables plan. IT is noted that the best overall back is not McFadden but Bush. He is a better blocker, and he has better hands. He is also a better passer having played QB before turning to running back.. Please do your research there are holes throughout this entire posting..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You neglected to mention how much sharper Russell looked in his final OTA. You also failed to mention that Russell accuracy issues could be linked to the Raider&#8217;s defense applying intense pressure on Russell right out the box. This was Cables plan. IT is noted that the best overall back is not McFadden but Bush. He is a better blocker, and he has better hands. He is also a better passer having played QB before turning to running back.. Please do your research there are holes throughout this entire posting..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Black Hole Fan</title>
		<link>http://www.rotorob.com/2009/06/20/2009-rotorob-nfl-draft-kit-oakland-raiders-team-preview/comment-page-1/#comment-32092</link>
		<dc:creator>Black Hole Fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 17:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rotorob.com/?p=5131#comment-32092</guid>
		<description>This article is a joke - the &quot;writer&quot; will eat these words</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article is a joke &#8211; the &#8220;writer&#8221; will eat these words</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
