videogames
 
 
 
 
 
cheap jerseys from china

A’s Addendum

March 20, 2008 | By RotoRob | comment on this post
Gio Gonzalez will be a big part of the A's future.
I was remiss not to mention Gio Gonzalez in our A’s Season Preview. Forgive me, Tim.

Further to Tuesday’s season preview of the Oakland A’s, RotoRob writer Tim McLeod gave me some shit for not mentioning Gio Gonzalez, one of his personal faves and part of the booty from the Nick Swisher trade.

As we know, the A’s have parted with plenty of stars over the last six or seven years, allowing them to either walk as free agents, or dealing them as they neared free agency. Included in this list are such one-time or current studs as Jason Giambi, Miguel Tejada, Tim Hudson, Mark Mulder and Barry Zito.

But what about the players Oakland has gotten back through its purging? Let’s check how that’s gone.

By allowing Giambi to bolt to the Yanks, Oakland received two picks, the first of which was used to select Joe Blanton, the second to grab catcher Jeremy Brown. Blanton, as discussed, is now the de facto ace, although could be on his way out in the next deal. Brown is still improving offensively, but is no longer exclusively a catcher and has been passed by Kurt Suzuki as the catching option going forward.

When Tejada left for Charm City in 2003, the A’s again got two picks as compensation. The first one turned out to be Huston Street - another wise choice, but, like Blanton, perhaps someone who will be in the next wave of A’s to be sent packing. The second draft pick was used to get Michael Rogers, a swingman who has not panned out (career ERA of almost 6.00) yet, and looks like an extreme longshot.

When Oakland dealt Hudson to the Braves in 2004, the return was outfielder Charles Thomas, SP Dan Meyer and RP Juan Cruz. Thomas played all of 30 games with the A’s before being dealt to Milwaukee for catcher J.D. Closser, who is looking like an organizational player at best. Meyer, as I discussed in the preview, has a chance to stick as the fifth starter. And Cruz was absolute firestarter in his one season in an Oakland uni before he was dealt to ‘Zona for Brad Halsey, who was decent as a swingman in 2006 before missing most of last season with an injury.

Dealing Agent Mulder in 2004 turned out to be a fantastic move. Not only did the A’s get top prospect Daric Barton, dependable (until last year) reliever Kiko Calero and emerging ace Dan Haren back from the Cards, but Mulder’s incessant injury issues have made the trade incredibly one-sided in the A’s favour.

When Zito was signed away by the Giants, the A’s earned themselves two bonus picks in last year’s draft. They used them to grab Sean Doolittle, a two-way college star likely ticketed to play first base as a pro, and Grant Desme, who will hopefully help address the team’s lack of outfield depth over the next couple of years.

When Haren was flipped this offseason (along with Connor Robertson), Oakland got a boatload of prospects from Arizona: Brett Anderson (one of the top pitching prospects in the game), Dana Eveland (who could win the fifth starter job this spring), Greg Smith (another arm with great potential), Aaron Cunningham (adding some much needed outfield depth), Carlos Gonzalez (a future fixture in LF in Oakland) and Chris Carter (another dart at first base).

In addition to Gio Gonzalez, the A’s also landed good looking young pitcher Fautino De Los Santos and OF prospect Ryan Sweeney from the Sox in exchange for Swisher.

And in exchange for Mark Kotsay, the A’s received future closer Joey Devine from the Braves.

Share
Feed Burner eMail Get RotoRob by Email: Enter your email below to receive daily updates direct to your inbox. Only a pink taco wouldn’t subscribe.
PostShadow

6 Responses to “A’s Addendum”

  1. Jon says:

    After the brief history lesson…how credible is Bean’s body of work? With the lack of results out of the old talent does the new talent need to succed in order to legitimze Billy’s career?

  2. RotoRob says:

    How can you qualify five division titles in eight years as a lack of results? If good results are only measured by trips to the World Series, then fine, Oakland is a horrific failure under Beane. But I think you’re being a bit harsh given the circumstances.

  3. Jon says:

    It is a small division…Shouldn’t he shoulder the responsibility for the lack of titles with all those division wins? Horrific failure is a bit different than a failure.
    I think he has a lot to prove with what he does this season, because they still have some valuable assets on a non-contender.

  4. RotoRob says:

    I think if the team is winning division titles, the GM is doing his job. If they are not winning playoff games, that’s on the manager. My two cents, anyways.

  5. SportsHubris says:

    I doubt Cashman would agree with that. It’s on both of them in both circumstances.
    I’m simply trying to point out that Bean has a lot of work to do this season, and if he doesn’t do a good job it’s going to put his whole body of work into question.

  6. RotoRob says:

    I don’t agree. The GM has no influence on the game decisions. All he can do is build a team with enough talent to have a chance; he can’t pull the strings on the field. Having said that, I will concede that the GM has to be on the hook for hiring the manager who WILL take the team over the top, so from that perspective, I agree with you.

Leave a Reply